Oracodent logo

ABOUT

Interfacing Research & Education with

Maxillofacial, Oral & Dental Practice


All professionals, who accept the responsibility to provide treatments which meet current standards of care, must expand and reinforce the knowledge and skills gained during his / hers undergraduate training by following the development within their discipline. This has for long been accepted by all parties involved; be it governmental or nongovernmental research and educational institutions, professional organizations, or publicly or privately organized oral health care units. The weights attached to the classical means to update professional performances have varied, but the suggested possibilities have usually been very similar; i.e. a mixture of recommended scientific literature (journals and textbooks), structured continuing educational courses and in house training.

However, what is needed in terms of prudent practice does not equal to keep abreast with the steadily increasing flow of research data; which in terms of scientific advances has been held to surpass even the most up-to-date educational training provided only 5 years earlier. This fact is not always appreciated, and many educational approaches are thus overloaded with new findings out of laboratories and experimental settings, which are way away from clinical phase three trials, and which moreover often remain isolated and / or incomprehensible because the ground connecting them with the reader's past basic training has not been given due attention. The same dilemma commonly belittles the otherwise well intended general advice to meet what is needed by studying some set number of accredited scientific journals on a regular basis.

It is with a focus on the above perspectives that we have approached, and are at work with ..

The authors
G.V. Black: "The Professional Man has No right to be other than a Continuous student" 

CITATIONS FROM THE BULLETIN BOARD OF ORAL PATHOLOGY (BBOP)

".. You touch on my sore spot. WE ALL LOVE REVIEWS but we get no thanks or credit if we write them, and often get abuse since it is believed that "anyone can do them"! The IF shows how very much they are used .. Such is the hypocrisy of academia! "

".. a barrage of misused terms are found. A "mixed tumor" which is not mixed and a reparative granuloma which does not repair anything, fortunately these two are now almost extinct but still many other remain. Pyogenic granuloma without pus, osteitis without inflammation or osteitis instead of osteomyelitis. Is the term granuloma always correct? A cyst for us must have epithelium when by classical definition it does not need to. Is a mucocele a cyst? and now do all DG desquamate?  - But on second thoughts I think that an official academy for oral pathology / medicine terms will end up in the same way as the construction of the Babel tower, which according to the Book of Genesis was interrupted by the confusion of tongues ".

"I am asking for information, personal experiences or literature reference, regarding patients who are otherwise well but for years have had multiple, recurrent pyogenic granulomas. I have considered gingival enlargement in ligneous conjunctivitis but the patient has no eye lesions. Thanks"

".. No doubt the next generation will learn from digital texts and pictures on their laptops, but these books will be a pleasure to read for a long time yet."


Copyright ©   The ORACODENT Faculty / Secretariat   All rights reserved